www.leasingnews.org  Tuesday, April 2, 2002

Accurate, fair and unbiased news for the equipment Leasing Industry

 

           Headlines----

 

Small Ticket Leasing

  Pat Roberts —What GOLF Means

      Tranax Technologies ATM Expansion

         GE Capital/CLP Chicago Sympathy

              April Fool’s Edition Reaction

                 EAEL/UAEL Las Vegas Conference

                    ePlus Expands Presence

                         Dancing Our Way—NY Times

 

 

 

The List Will Be Up-Dated This Week

 

              Stories We Are Working Upon---

 

  The Funding Tree/ Bancorp Group/ New Century Bank/ PinnFund Leasing

 

### Denotes Press Release

__________________________________________________________-

 

Small Ticket Leasing

 

 

Sterling Bank Leasing is an active funding source for small ticket

"app only" deals.

 

We'll be at the ELA Funding Exhibit in Chicago

later this month. 

 

Contact Bob Krause  212 575 2473

Robert Krause

Robert.Krause@sterlingbancorp.com

 

----

 

Name = John Martella

Address = 368 Vets Hwy

City = Commack

State = NY

Zip code = 11725

Phone = 631 858 5157

Fax = 631 864 8215

Email = jmartell@sovereignbank.com

 

 

Comments = I would like to offer my comments on small ticket funding relationship. 

 

Network Capital Alliance is a division of Sovereign Bank.

 

We are very active in the portfolio funding segment and we do have a one-off small ticket funding program for qualified lessors with vendor programs or relationships. I have been involved with lessor funding programs since 1976. 

 

Please feel free to contact me if you like to hear my thoughts on the market place and direction of the industry. 

 

----

               

Leasecomm/ Microfinancial is a truly small ticket leasing company in the

$1,000 to $10,000 range (we can go higher selectively).  We do business in

all 50 States, have an approved list for equipment types (office furniture

is definitely on it), and have numerous programs depending what you want to

accomplish.  We take both personal guarantee and business-only applications.

 

We best like deal flow on a program basis, and will buy small-ticket

portfolios up to $5 million.

 

 Even so, if you become LC-registered (required to do business), you can be very successful with your one-off deal flow,

once we match our buying parameters with yours.

 

   

George S. Imrey

Leasecomm Corporation, subsidiary of

MicroFinancial, Inc. (NYSE: MFI)

10 M Commerce Way

Woburn, MA 01801

800-515-5327 x.7006

fax 781-994-4715

 

---

 

.  At LeaseNOW we have had a "bulk purchase" program for

many years.  When I first approached several funding sources about doing

bulk purchase around 1995-96, I had very few people who were interested

in the concept.  I have recently visited several lenders and the

situation has completely changed. 

 

Most of the funding sources are no longer interested in "one off" business and there is a deep concern over approval/closing ratios. Most of the major funding sources that are left

do not want to consider any third party relationships that don't bring

them at least $3MM per year in funded business.

 

 They are very focused on the costs of processing business from a multitude of brokers and lessors and they are beginning to get a clue as to how to price business

on the basis of the value that a third party originator brings to the

relationship. I believe that this will work to the benefit of some

originators but to the detriment of many others.

 

In my opinion, originators can expect to see requests for UNL reserve

accounts that will limit the amount of PV they are advanced.  There will

also be more expected of the originator with respect to the ongoing

management of the portfolio.  This will not just be lip service but

actual assistance.

 

As an originator, if you want special consideration on a program or

market niche, you will have to be able to provide detailed information

as to how you will help your funding source mange that business.

Originators who add value to the overall process of originating and

managing business will receive preference over those who don't. 

 

I have noticed a fundamental shift from a "volume" driven mentality to

an "operationally" driven mentality. This attitudinal shift will be very

difficult to handle for those who made no effort to understand the

lender from the operations point of view.  This shift, incidentally,

always occurs when volume is flat or down. 

 

Many of the lenders I have spoken to do not want to do small deals at

$3,$4 or $5,000 any more.  The reason, they say, is that they do not

make any money at them.  This answer magnifies the problem that the

originator will go through in managing the change to an operational

mentality. 

 

When volume was king, these types of deal would get done

without regard to the cost of booking that type of business.  They were

the equivalent of the "loss leader" in the retail business. You did

small deals, hoped to break even or minimize your losses, and engineer a

"relationship" with a vendor because you were "accommodating" them.

This works fine while the tide is rising. When business begins to ebb,

however, you have to make money on every deal you do. 

 

For example, if you do a $5K deal for 48 months and it costs $6.00 per

month to send out the statement and process the check.  This will eat up

$288.00 of the profit in the deal.

 

 If a lender that is in good financial shape has a cost of fund of 5.25% and they give the broker a "buy rate" of 11.25%, they have a 600 basis point spread.  If the broker

adds 10% commission the total yield is 18.25%.

 

 If you discount the payment stream (no advances for simplicity sake) the total GP in the

deal is approximately $1150.00.  The broker will be paid $500 of than

(10%). That leaves $650.00 for the funder to process, book, bill and

collect the transaction.  Above we determined that the manual billing

alone would cost $288. This leaves $362.00.

 

 If the lender's IDC (initial direct cost) is 2.5% then that will eat up another $125.00 of

the deal.  The lender has $237.00 left to pay for operations.  All of

this assumes that the transaction is perfect and a collector never has

to call or a collection letter never has to be sent.  With more and more

lenders basing their pricing on ROE this transaction would have to be

perfect to barely meet a 15% ROE requirement that most lenders have.

Many lenders that cannot make the ROE requirements add fee income

programs that can sometimes be considered surreptitious at best. 

 

What is the solution to this?  Deal sizes down to $5K are a benefit from

the marketing standpoint.  I recently proposed the following to a lender

who stated that they didn't make any money on small ticket deals.  Since

the primary cost is in the billing, let's make ACH mandatory on any

transaction under $15K.  If the customer balks at ACH then the payment

is increased by 3.5% to offset the cost of manual billing.  This one

simple action would undoubtedly solve the problem and bring the return

for the lender more in line with their requirements.  A $175 bump to the

lender makes a big difference on a deal this size. If you offer this to

your lender and they are still reluctant then that would be an excellent

sign that you still have a hidden objection.

 

Lastly, remember that as third party originators, we have to be the

creative ones. The lenders that remain do not feel pressure to be

creative.  It's a supply/demand thing right now. Do not approach the

lender until you have thought the program through and have outlined a

solution that produces a profit and mitigates risk.  If you can approach

a lender, strategically, there is an excellent chance that you will walk

away with the program you wanted.

 

Bob Rodi

 

 

President

LeaseNOW, Inc.

drlease@leasenow.com

www.leasenow.com

1-800-321-LEAS (5327)x 101

 

 

---- 

 

    Where I see the problem is in equating the phrase "small ticket" with "application only".  When I joined this industry in 1983,     there was no such thing as "app-only" to $100K and "credit scores" were almost unheard of.  Almost every deal we     presented to a lender was packaged which seems to have become a lost art.

 

 Sometimes an offering needed to be made    more palatable for a lender so we offered structuring, another lost art.  During my early years in this industry, I learned that     the relationship between a broker and funding source is almost sacrosanct; it was a privilege to be accepted by a funding     source and charged with the fiduciary responsibility the relationship brings. The expansion of funding sources ten years or so     ago all competing for the same broker business changed all that, and the situation became the tail wagging the dog. 

 

As the  situation has once again reversed, what we are seeing today is the funding sources which remain are slipping very     comfortably in the role they played in the 80s, calling the shots in this funding-source controlled market,  being purposely    choosey as to what business they buy and who they buy that business from. 

 

    To summarize, I do not see small ticket going away, I see it changing, perhaps dramatically.  To the lease broker, I impeach you not to be disheartened. Recognize and accept what's going on.

Keep learning.

 Stay diligent. 

Get creative.

 Be collaborative.

 Above all, and through it all, hold on to your integrity.

 

Jim Fleming nationalbusinesscredit@yahoo.com

 

----

 

Dwight Galloway, Republic Leasing of South Carolina

 

We are thrilled that the acquisition of our parent, RBMG, by NetBank is now complete!  For the first time since 1994, Republic Leasing Company will not have to use securitization to finance the portfolio because the Bank will provide a more reliable and lower cost of funds.  Having known and worked with NetBank since its inception, we were not surprised to learn that they want us to “continue doing business in the same manner” as we have for 14 years.

 

Our business model will remain the same: provide lease brokers with a consistent, reliable funding source that bases its decisions on the lessee’s credit (not collateral) and holds and services all the resulting small to lower middle market leases.   Because we do not use automated scoring, and because we want to offer good rates for good credits, we will continue to require efficiency in our broker relationships.   We prize brokers of any size who know their deals and who value their funding relationships enough to send applications that meet our credit parameters.  Contrary to many funders (or former funders), we have no minimum volume requirements, just minimum efficiency standards.   

 

Although the lower cost of funds will allow Republic to better meet the needs of broker-lessors with unique programs or market niches, our main focus will remain the experienced broker, regardless of size, with whom we can develop a mutual trust.   Whether its one deal a quarter or one deal per hour, we will continue to require good approval and closing ratios.  Our present rate of applications is higher than at any time in our history and in order to maintain good service to our efficient brokers, we will continue the practice of eliminating the most inefficient.

 

No source contributes more than 4% of our volume.  We look to quality brokers

and not how much they send us, but what we approve and what they sign. Barry

Reitman is an excellent example. His approval and sign rate is very high.

 

We are inundated with applications due to the demise of so many funding sources.

We cannot give them the attention they are due as we don’t use credit scoring

or any tricks, but look at each transaction as an individual application.

 

With our new cost of funds, we will expand from our $15,000 marketplace

into the $350,000 arena.  What we need now are marketing managers to

help us find the experienced broker that we can give our full attention to, as our

cost of funds gives a better opportunity to establish professional relationships.

 

We want to look at every deal, understand it.  Our parent company does all

their business through third parties.  They understand our market place.  I

have never been so thrilled in the leasing business since 1994.  Charles

Randall and I are really looking forward to 2002 and the opportunities

Netbank has given to us.

 

Dwight Galloway

 

( Leasing News has invited Dwight Galloway to appear on “Meet the Leasing

News Maker.”  With Capitol Hill at ELA, the NAELB Conference, and other

activities, this may not be for another two weeks, as Mr. Galloway will

be on the road.. Editor )

 

 

 

 

Pat Roberts---What Golf Means

 

Thumbs up to Jerry Withrow who knows his golf!

Thumbs down to Bill Clark who isn't current on handicaps.

 

 And why on earth  would I say I was a 40 if I wasn't?  I love playing golf, I'm not slow, and I hate having a handicap that high.

 

 An afterthought - do you know what golf stands for? 

 

Gentlemen Only - Ladies Forbidden.    

 

And to Jerry Withrow:  don't you have a golf tournament kind of imitating

that sentiment?  What was it called again?  LOL

 

Pat Roberts ( the one and only. editor )

PERTS1@aol.com

 

 

------

 

NEW DIGS PROVIDE ELBOW ROOM FOR R&D ON ATMs

 

Tranax Technologies Inc., an ATM company, announced recently that it will

begin operating today in its new corporate headquarters in Fremont, CA.

 

The

new facility provides increased space for production, research and

development and logistics, as well as additional office space.

 

 Tranax, formerly Cross International, will be moving into its third office in four

years. A company spokesperson says rapid growth made more space a necessity.

 

"In addition to an expanded headquarters facility, the new Nobel Drive

building provides us with enough space to substantially increase our

production capacity and to build a world-class logistics operation for both

finished goods and service parts," says Mike Sedrel, Tranax's director of

operations.

 

 Tranax Technologies Inc. has installed more than 25,000 ATMs

since 1998, according to a company news release.

 

BANK TECHNOLOGY NEWS WEEKLY BULLETIN

 

 

GE Capital/CLP Chicago Sympathy

 

I agree with the person who wrote the following about GE Capital in Chicago

"The complainers are the same people that complained when they had over 200

staff processing the business."

 

Obviously the new relationship is not like the "old days of CPLC" but all of

the old members of the Portland team have been very helpful during the

transition and every person we have dealt with in Chicago has been very

pleasant and willing to help! We have suffered the same delays in the

funding process as everyone else but have been very up-front with our

vendors and customers about the situation and people will understand if they

are kept in the loop!

 

Nothing like this is easy but we are doing our best to help educate those in

Chicago to make it easier for us and others in the future.

 

Bob Skibinski

Taycor Financial

Bob Skibinski bob@taycor.com

 

 

You may quote any part or all without our permission.  We have not rules or

regulations.  Please send to a colleague as we are the only “insider” electronic

newspaper with the truth, accurate and unbiased, no axe to grind.  You get

it here first, too.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

April Fool’s Edition Reaction

 

That was fun!

Susan Carol

scapr@technologywriters.com

 

--

 

 

Very cute!

 

 

     David

 

  David G. Mayer

  Patton Boggs LLP

  2001 Ross Avenue