May 30, 2000
-- Rick Wilbur shares a recent experience --

Kit: Given the prevailing funding environment I thought it appropriate and timely to share a recent experience with you. Please feel free to pass this along.
I recently had a conversation with the credit manager of a 'funding source', a gentleman that I've known and respected for many many years. During the course of the conversation I asked him how their operation was doing since the last transaction we did with them was an absolute nightmare to complete (documentation and funding). He told me things were much better and encouraged me to try them again. Due, at least in part, to my long standing relationship with him I responded by previewing a transaction I had on my desk for a Lessee that we had done 12 Corp Only leases for during the past eighteen months. A very good customer. After providing transaction details he thought the deal would be approved and invited it in. I agreed to submit it despite this funding sources high rate. In my opinion I was offering them 'a cherry'.

Early the next day we received a faxed approval for a $50,000 Corp Only with a limitation on points. I asked if we exceeded the allowed limitation on points could we split the difference with the funding source. My old friend didn't know but would check. Approximately five hours later we received another fax from 'the Broker Manager'. Paraphrased the fax said:(1) the deal didn't fit their normal corp only requirements and essentially they made several exceptions for us (this was news to me because I didn't know what their normal corp only requirements were and didn't ask for any exception to be made), (2)the paydex was too low to do a Corp Only (our D&B reported a Paydex of 79), (3) the company had too few employees (D&B reported 40 and a recent article that we provided reported not only had the company just raised an additional $6.4 million but also stated the company expected to increase from 70 employees to 100 by the end of July).

The guy wasn't impressed and bottom line they now wanted a comparable corp only reference that dated back at least a year and a written explanation of numerous inquiries on the principals TRW despite the fact that there was no personal guaranty (this started to feel a lot like homework). When I told him that it was a bit late in the process to add conditions to their approval he pretty much told me ....'too %#@^ing bad'. I told him that I'd try to get the information but in light of the fact that we had not needed that information for any of the 12 other transactions we completed and that we had already conveyed their approval, I wasn't sure I could get the information. I asked him if he would honor his approval if I couldn't get what he wanted and the guy absolutely refused to answer my question. He told me point blank that he wasn't going to tell me. Almost thirty-five years in this business and I thought I'd heard it all.

I believe the relationships that we enjoy with most of our funding sources are based on mutual respect, mutual trust and a sincere concern and appreciation for the other. Fortunately, the situation I described in this e-mail is an aberration but I believe it may be an indication of the current mentality of some in the community. If the funders can't trust and respect the originators and the originators can't trust and respect the funders we're all in for a very rough ride.

Rick Wilbur
Managing Partner
Media Capital Associates,LLC
www.mediacap.com
(800) 836-7753 ext. 104

 


www.leasingnews.org
Leasing News, Inc. (Pending)
346 Mathew Street,
Santa Clara,
California 95050
Voice: 800-727-7477 Fax: 800-727-3853
kitmenkin@leasingnews.org