|
| October 11, 2000 Broker's
Lament--------- Kit By the way, Tuxedo Park is in NY, not NJ, however the rest of the story is true. Tuxedo Park is 5 minutes from my office. daryl
( I can't see too well recently, so thought the Y was a J. Daryl is correct: "This day in 1886 Griswold Lorillard of Tuxedo Park, New York, fashioned the first tuxedo for men." Not New Jersey,but New York.---editor ) ( I am getting static from my advisory board and from readers for not attributing "opinions". I have been really worked over for telling sources on the telephone, and will not do so. No one will trust me if I do not honor their instruction. Many fear attribution. Here is an excellent example, I think, and I asked him if I could quote him...he said yes, but don't use his name---editor ) A Broker's Lament I find the industry going in the wrong direction for many people like me. My funding sources have told me to expect to see higher rates and a demand for better credits. I'm confused, because in the 80's that policy promoted portfolio run-off. I understand tightening credit but this doesn't make sense. Another funding source said that broker paper has more fraud than from direct sales people. Ask DCC and Eaton (oh' he's no longer in business, twice)or Master Lease (excuse me, they're not around either), just to name a few. The answer is educating the brokers and giving them a CLEAR understanding of what the Funding source will accept. I talked to 1 finding source the other day who said that he was working with a broker on a deal whose owner had a BK. The other day that same funding source said they didn't accept deals with a BK. The Funding Sources are inviting us to shot-gun applications, however, that's against our broker agreement. It's disgusting and they won't be happy until they aren't getting any more business from us 'cheating, money grabbing, fraud riddled, self serving' brokers. After all, we don't care about anyone except ourselves. ( I asked him if I could quote him and use his name. Here is his response: ) Kit, Your summary of my statement is OK except I'd like to keep my name out of it. It's been my experience that policy makers don't get mad, they get even. They never were on 'the street' trying to make a buck so some low-life broker can't know what's really going on. And if they were on the street, they were quitters. I had this same argument with a direct source I worked for in the 80's. I couldn't tell the inside people what was going on because they would make it hard on my Vendors if I showed them up. Life goes on and that's why brokers move from source to source. There's no consistency with one source. I get a kick out of the 80's when things started to go bad. Their answer was: 1.
raise rates With 2 kids in college and a hefty mortgage, every deal is important. The Funding Sources just play with our minds with the hopes of 'the next deal'. Their philosophy is for us to send them all our business so that they can pick and choose and discard the rest. No relationship is being formed to treat us like 'part of the company'. The closest I have come to a true funding source was Nations Credit. I knew what they wanted and they treated me great. But then came Textron with 25% residuals and rude customer service people. Kit, as you can tell, I have a lot of anger and confusion at the same time. It's been a rocky road the last 15 years. As an attorney for one of our illustrious trade groups said to me, 'you guys made a fortune and now your paying for it'. Excuse me!!! Marshall & Ilsley Corporation Reports Third Quarter Earnings MILWAUKEE, Oct. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Marshall & Ilsley Corporation (NYSE: MI) today announced operating income for the third quarter ended September 30, 2000 was $90.6 million, compared to $90.8 million net income recorded in the same period in 1999. Diluted income per share increased 2.5 percent to $.83 for the third quarter, versus $.81 for the same period a year ago. Cash diluted income per share was $.88, versus $.85 a year ago. Return on average assets was 1.44 percent versus 1.56 percent in 1999. Return on tangible equity was 20.46 percent this quarter compared to 21.04 percent for the third quarter of 1999. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, operating income was $271.5 million, versus $263.9 million of income for the same period in 1999. Diluted income per share was $2.49, versus $2.33 for the nine months ended September 30, 1999. Assets at quarter end were $25.2 billion, compared to $23.6 billion for the same period in 1999. Book value per share was $20.62 at September 30, 2000, compared to $19.41 for the same date a year ago. Total loans were $17.3 billion, versus $15.6 billion at September 30, 1999. Operating income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2000, excludes losses from the sale of investment securities and loans, expenses of the Metavante Corporation IPO and expenses associated with charter consolidations which aggregated $38.8 million after tax. Net income and diluted earnings per share amounted to $51.8 million and $.48 for the three months, and $232.6 million and $2.13 for the nine months, ended September 30, 2000, respectively. Marshall & Ilsley Corporation, headquartered in Milwaukee, Wis., has $25.2 billion in assets. The Corporation has 26 affiliate banks with more than 200 offices in Wisconsin. The Corporation also has a bank in Phoenix, Ariz. with 13 offices, a bank in Nevada with offices located in Illinois and Florida and trust companies in Wisconsin, Arizona and Florida. M&I, a diversified financial services company, also owns and operates 49 offices throughout the country that provide trust and investment management, equipment leasing, mortgage banking and data processing. Marshall & Ilsley Corporation will hold a conference call at 11:00 a.m. central daylight time, Wednesday, October 11 regarding third quarter earnings. For those interested in listening, please call 800-949-2165 and reference the M&I Quarterly Financial Conference Call. SOURCE Marshall & Ilsley Corporation CO: Marshall & Ilsley Corporation ST: Wisconsin -Leasing Industry Veteran Joins LeasePoint.com as Vice President, Leasing Services MINNEAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 11, 2000--LeasePoint.com, an emerging industry leader in technology equipment leasing, announced today it has named Bill Patton as vice president of leasing services. In his new role, Patton will be responsible for developing and cultivating the company's relationships with national vendor partners who provide technology equipment to a broad audience of end-users. Immediately prior to joining LeasePoint.com, Bill spent four years as vice president for Lease Acceptance Corporation. During this time he was key to the implementation of an online lease process for retail technology markets. "Bill has spent the last 16 years working in equipment leasing sales, management and operations," David McNutt, founder and CEO of LeasePoint.com, said. "His understanding of the industry will help further develop the product portfolio LeasePoint.com brings to the leasing industry. We are very excited to have him." From 1984 - 1995, Patton served in various management positions including vice president at AT&T Capital Corporation, establishing the fastest growing, most profitable region in the company. At AT&T, Patton helped to design a credit scoring system and worked closely with credit processing and vendor funding, giving him first-hand experience with the hassles of paper-born equipment leasing. "There are a number of challenges within traditional equipment leasing," Patton said. "LeasePoint.com opens leasing to a wider variety of vendors by simplifying the industry and removing obstacles typically associated with leasing." Patton began his career in leasing by opening and expanding eight sales and regional offices for Eaton Financial Corporation. He built and restructured new sales territories, and increased his region's sales and portfolio by 500 percent in two years. Patton holds a bachelor of science degree in business and finance from the University of Oregon. About LeasePoint.com Located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, LeasePoint.com is rapidly emerging as an industry-leading Internet site for businesses seeking to lease technology equipment. LeasePoint.com matches business customers needing technology equipment with vendors and lenders to give businesses the best lease options available. LeasePoint does this with specially developed technology that removes the obstacles of traditional leasing and makes the process fast and easy. CONTACT: LeasePoint.com, Minneapolis Elen Bahr Vice President of Marketing 952-841-7500 ebahr@leasepoint.com
AccessLease Launches Private-Label Online Leasing Solution AccessLease launched its online private-label leasing solution designed for equipment and software providers, B2B marketplaces and financial institutions that want to add a branded point-of-sale financing option for all of their customers. AccessLease enables institutions to give their customers instant access to the industry's best equipment and lowest rates from the nation's top funding sources. With AccessLease's proprietary scoring and analysis technology, vendors of the private-label solutions gain new or increased revenue through a branded channel, real-time order fulfillment and a higher percentage of approved customer leases. In turn, their business customers benefit from lower pricing; access to a diverse product selection; a simple application and fast approval process; and 24-hour online account management. "We seek to enable real-time frictionless distribution of capital for equipment acquisition over the Internet -- which means true point-of-sale leasing, regardless of the channel a customer goes through to purchase equipment or software for their business," said Troy Klith, founder and CEO of AccessLease. As a proof-of-concept of this new solution, AccessLease is hosting an online marketplace that gives small businesses a way to lease equipment from a variety of top vendors via qualified funding sources. The company also announced Monday that Planetary Networks, a reseller of Cisco equipment and products, has implemented the AccessLease Solution to offer online leasing to its small business and Fortune 500 customers. The founders of AccessLease came from traditional leasing companies where they recognized a number of inefficiencies in the unregulated equipment leasing industry that demanded a new, streamlined process. Equipment and software providers and B2B marketplaces demanded real-time point-of-sale funding solutions while providing a broad credit offering to their customers. Funding sources incurred high transaction costs while only providing leases to 20% of the applicants, and business customers found it difficult to obtain market rate information, struggled with cumbersome, paper-intensive processes and were typically paying up to a 25% markup charge for leasing. The AccessLease solution easily integrates within equipment and software providers and B2B marketplaces' point-of-sale infrastructures so they can offer their own customers (the lessees) an automated, cost-effective real-time leasing solution. AccessLease's private-label leasing solution includes real-time credit scoring and decision making that determines risk, chooses a lender profile, and adjusts pricing utilizing its national network of lease funding sources; sophisticated lease analysis tools; automated documentation-generation and online status reporting. AccessLease also offers a point-of-sale leasing solution for sales forces to directly manage and facilitate leasing transactions for their customers. Business customers that lease through private-label solutions powered by AccessLease have access to diverse lending packages that accommodate "A" through "D" credit types. The beta version of the AccessLease System will be available in October and commercially available by the end of the year. The sales force point-of-sale leasing solution is available now.
Finova Stock Falls As Buyout Hopes Wane Shares of beleaguered Finova Group, which had been fluctuating for months on buy out rumors, are now dropping as speculation focuses on less glamorous bailout alternatives. "A large amount of hope (for a buyer) has been lost," said Legg Mason Wood Walker analyst David Sochol. "This is a very troubled company." If
potential buyers have been doing due diligence on Finova - as its executives have
said - those suitors have probably realized that their shareholders would probably
not approve of a purchase of the Scottsdale, AZ, financial-services company, Sochol
said. Some analysts think a change in management also is needed to restore credibility. In addition, Finova, which recently sold a receivables factoring division for $235 million, may announce sales of additional divisions, analysts said.
Finova Chief Executive Matt Breyne said he is "disappointed" with the length of
time it is taking to make the deal or deals necessary to turn the company around.
Later in August, Finova Chairman John Teets said several parties had expressed interest in recapitalizing the company with an equity infusion of $250 million to $300 million or more. At the time, he said he expected to announce a deal within 30 days. One month later, the stock inched above $8 a share as rumors swirled about a possible investor; when a deal didn't materialize according to Teets' timetable, the stock dropped again. Finova Senior Vice President Stu Tashlik said Teets' August remarks were "just an estimate of when he thought something would happen." The failure to announce a deal by the end of September doesn't necessarily mean a deal has fallen through, he added. But
analysts said the kind of investment Teets mentioned may not be enough to make
a difference to Finova and might anger shareholders by diluting the value of their
stock. That
Finova is talking about an equity infusion, he added, probably means the company
is suffering from greater loan losses than it has previously disclosed.
An equity sale could fail to return Finova to an investment-grade company, said
analyst Rob Schwartzberg of Friedman Billings Ramsey & Co. If
Finova can't sell itself in total, it might make sense for it to sell off more
divisions, some analysts said. That's not at the top of the company's list, Breyne
said, but it could be considered as a last resort to pay off loans coming due
in the spring. Schwartzberg agreed that it would make more sense to liquidate assets, particularly if Finova can raise the equivalent of $10 to $12 a share rather than sell stock at current market prices. It is possible that a combination of several deals could work out for investors in the end, Hughes said. "They are intimating strongly they're going to get cash," he said. "Hopefully, they'll get it; they'll sell some assets, and they'll bide their time (until the market improves for selling the rest of the company). Long-term, structurally, they may want to liquidate the company." News of any deal would be good news for investors at this point, said analyst Mike Vinciquerra with Raymond James & Associates. But Schwartzberg said that no news by Nov. 14 "is more likely to be perceived as bad news."
First Bancorp Reports Record Earnings in Third Quarter SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico, Oct. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- First BanCorp (NYSE: FBP) reported today earnings of $16,699,212 or $0.56 per share (basic and diluted), for the third quarter of 2000, as compared to earnings of $16,208,146 or $0.50 per share (basic and diluted) for the third quarter of 1999; an increase of 12% in earnings per share. Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) were 1.23% and 21.26%, respectively, for the quarter, as compared to 1.51% and 21.02% respectively, for the same quarter of last year. Return on common equity was 26.94% for the quarter as compared to 26.74% for the same quarter of 1999. Average common shares used to calculate earnings per share were 26,724,904 (basic) and 26,926,717 (diluted). For the nine months period ended September 30, 2000, earnings were $49,527,651 or $1.65 per share (basic) and $1.64 per share (diluted), as compared to $45,742,875 or $1.48 per share (basic) and $1.47 per share (diluted), for the first nine months of 1999, an increase of 11.6% in diluted earnings per share. The earnings increase is mainly the result of a rise in net interest income and other income. Commenting on third quarter results, Mr. Angel Alvarez, CEO of First BanCorp, said, "we have experienced substantial loan growth and notable results of our efforts to diversify our sources of revenues; we are very pleased with the results we have achieved so far during 2000." Net interest income, the Corporation's main source of income, was $47.0 million during the third quarter of 2000, as compared to $46.8 million for the third quarter of 1999. New loan volumes in the corporate sector provided a notable increase in the Corporation's revenues, which helped offset higher funding costs. Other income was $13.3 million for the quarter, as compared to $8.5 million for the same quarter last year, a 56% increase. This increase of $4.8 million in other income is mainly due to new recurring fees and charges and also includes a gain of $2 million from the active management of the Corporation's investment portfolio, which has represented a continued source of income during the past years. Total assets amounted to $5,649 million as of September 2000 as compared to $4,374 million as of September 30, 1999, and $4,722 million as of December 31, 1999. Total deposits increased by $892 million, when compared to September 30, 1999 and by $657 million, when compared to December 31,1999. Total loans reached $3.3 billion, a 31% increase when compared to September 1999. During 2000, the Corporation has made additional efforts to maintain its above average efficiency ratio; this resulted in a ratio of 47.21% for this quarter, as compared to 46.83% for the same quarter of last year. This ratio has remained below 50% regardless of the fact that the Corporation has significantly invested in infrastructure to support new technologically advanced products and in new production areas like corporate services and middle market lending. Operating expenses increased to $28.5 million for the quarter, as compared to $25.9 million for the same quarter last year. The $2.6 million increase is the result of new human and technology resources to support the Bank's growth. The expense base for this third quarter of 2000 also includes four branches acquired in December 1999. The Corporation's provision for loan losses was $11.6 million, in line with the comparable third quarter 1999 provision of $11.0 million. Net charge offs during this quarter amounted to $10.7 million or 1.34% of average loans annualized, as compared to $10.4 million or 1.69% of average loans annualized, during the third quarter of 1999. Non-performing loans were $67.2 million or 2.03% of total loans as of September 30, 2000, as compared to $54.1 million or 2.14% of total loans as of September 30, 1999. The increase in the absolute amount is due to a large commercial loan, to the addition of non-performing loans of the First Virgin Islands' newly acquired operations, and to the general growth in the loan portfolio. The reserve coverage ratio (allowance to non-performing loans) was 113.7% as of September 30, 2000, as compared to 133.4% as of September 30, 1999. First BanCorp is a $5.6 billion Financial Holding Company. It is the parent company of FirstBank Puerto Rico, which is the second largest independently owned commercial bank in Puerto Rico. The Bank, which is a well-capitalized institution, operates 53 financial service facilities throughout Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. On September 25, 2000, FirstBank closed the acquisition of a small financial institution in the US Virgin Islands, which was immediately merged into the Bank. FirstBank also operates Money Express, a finance company, with 26 offices throughout the Island, and First Leasing and Car Rental, a car and truck rental leasing company, with offices in Bayamon, Rio Piedras, Guaynabo, Isabela, and Caguas. The List 49 Leasing Companies Major Changes
American Business Leasing ( gone ) any corrections, additions, or comments are appreciated. ( note: we are working on dividing this into two groups, one for changes in the last year time period only ) |
| | ||||||
|